About Ann Rolfe

My photo
Ann Rolfe is internationally recognised as Australia's leading specialist in mentoring, and is available for speaking, training and consulting. Here Ann shares her knowledge and allows you to ask your most pressing questions about mentoring.

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Matching Mentoring Partners

People think matching is crucial and perhaps it is. When you talk to people who have been matched by coordinators of a program, they will often want to know how the matches were made and, as a client once put it: "they want to believe that there was some science to it." People who have enjoyed the mentoring experience often say that it was "the chemistry" that was essential.

I beg to differ. I think that the skills and attitudes of both parties are what make the difference.

Mentorees need to want the opportunity and be prepared to commit to self-development.

Mentors need to understand that their role is to facilitate a process that enables their mentoring partner to set goals make informed decisions and action them.

Informed decisions, by definition, mean that some information has been accessed, appraised and accepted. A skilled mentor will firstly, assist the mentoree to access and reflect upon their own experience. If additional information is needed, other sources may be consulted and, the mentor may share their experiences or cite examples they have observed. Once sufficient information is available, the mentor facilitates a process of critical appraisal by the mentoree enabling them to choose an acceptable course of action.

The key factors in matching are really:

1. Selection criteria for participants

2. Education about the roles and responsibilities

3. Developing and supporting skills and attitudes

1. Selection 

Recruiting mentors is no different to recruitment for any other role. You’ll develop a range of selection criteria. Most of all though, you’ll want to choose mentors who are:

Willing - volunteers not conscripts;

Able - have, or can make the time required;

Capable - have or can develop skills of rapport, active listening, questioning;

Accept – that the role that is not to teach, preach, tell or sell their own ideas but rather to elicit the thoughts of their mentoring partner.

It also helps if the mentorees have some input to the matching by specifying what's important to them e.g gender, cultural background, geographic location, specific experience etc.

2. Education 

Prior to any mentoring program, you’ll have a communication strategy to help all employees understand what mentoring is and why it’s important. An information kit provided to people who are interested, or available on your intranet will help people understand mentoring roles and responsibilities and allow them to make an informed decision to opt in.

3. Development and Support 

No matter how experienced people are, some form of training is required for effective mentoring. You want to make sure that both parties are very clear on what they are doing and how to go about it. They need to understand what can go wrong and how to avoid problems. They need to learn the subtle skills that can make or break a relationship.

Once you have trained and put the pairs together is also vital. If there is no ongoing support, relationships can fizzle out. So you need a program of follow-up, activities and review processes to ensure mentoring achieves the desired outcomes.

I won't say matching doesn't matter, and you do need a planned strategy to make it work, but I will say that if you have two people who are willing, have good intent, know how to build rapport, listen actively and ask questions, teach them the mentoring process. I believe that’s what makes mentoring work!

What do you think?  Leave a comment!

4 comments:

Robert Ryan said...

This is a great Newsletter. Ann, you have hit the nail squarely on thehead and driven it all the way home with one swing! I agree with you wholeheartedly. In my experience as an “unofficial mentor”, I have discovered that someone who truly wishes to be mentored is not in it just for a handout and a quick step upward. They are prepared to take suggestions and run with them to make discoveries on their own…and know that their mentor is interested in hearing about those discoveries. On numerous occasions, I have had folks come to me for the “quick fix”. I now know how to avoid them. I have also had folks come to me for mentoring who appeared to be serious about it, only to discover that I was being leaned on or holding hands. The solution? Step away and let them fall and find their own way. Mentoring for me has always been a two way street, and the whole process is most successfully initiated by self
starters who realise that someone is a resource from whom much can be learned, and who do not need things to be handed to them on a silver
platter.

Thanks for this. It confirms for me that my approach to mentoring is an effective and responsible one.

Ann Rolfe said...

Thanks for your response and positive feedback.

Robert Ryan said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Robert Ryan said...

Thank you for your feedback! In comparison to you, I am a novice in the area of mentoring, so anything I receive from you and others is most welcome.

I put my “Dilbert” persona on the other day in conversation with a colleagues about holes left behind when someone with years of experience and insight leaves, and there has been no succession planning. “An absence of succession planning results in crater management.” Of course, mentoring is an integral part of succession planning, no?